MATH 150 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES 3
THE PRECISE DEFINITION OF THE LIMIT
|
Suppose we are watching the values of a function f (x) as x approaches x 0 (without assuming the value of x 0 itself). (See figure 1) We would like to be able to say that f (x) stays within 1/10 of a unit of L as soon as x stays within some d of x 0. The ± 1/10 should be treated like an error measurement. So as the error becomes smaller, and smaller, then new d -interval about x 0 will become smaller. This whole idea leads to the formal definition of the limit. |
figure 1 |
|
DEFINITION: |
A FORMAL DEFINITION OF THE LIMIT Let f (x) be defined on an open interval about x 0, except possibly at x 0 itself. We say that f (x) approaches the limit L as x approaches x 0 and write
if, for every number e > 0, there exists a corresponding number d > 0 such that for all x, 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e . |
|
EXAMPLE 1: |
Find a d > 0 such that for all x 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e for
|
|
SOLUTION: First of all, we need to find the limit of f as x approaches 1.
Now we will work backwards to find d . We will start with | f (x) - L | < e and manipulate it to get | x - 1 | < d .
We want the smaller of the two numbers in absolute value. The reason for this is that it will force the f (x) values to be within the given e value. Which number {-0.4375, .5625} is smaller in absolute value? It is -0.4375, so let d = |-0.4375| = 0.4375. |
|
EXAMPLE 2: |
Find a d > 0 such that for all x 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e for f(x) = 4 - x 2 at x 0 = -1 and e = 0.25. |
|
SOLUTION: First find the limit of f (x) as x approaches -1.
Now work backwards.
|
|
EXAMPLE 3: |
Find a d > 0 such that for all x 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e for f(x) = 2x - 2, L = -6, x 0 = -2, and e = 0.02. |
|
SOLUTION: We are given the value of the limit at x 0, so let us start working backwards.
So let d = 0.01. |
|
EXAMPLE 4: |
Find a d > 0 such that for all x 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e for f(x) = 1/x, L = 1/4, x 0 = 4, and e = 0.05. |
|
SOLUTION: Since -2/3 is the smaller in absolute value, let d = 2/3. |
|
EXAMPLE 5: |
Find a d > 0 such that for all x 0 < | x - x 0 | < d Þ | f (x) - L | < e for
|
|
SOLUTION:
So let d = 0.05. |
|
EXAMPLE 6: |
|
|
SOLUTION: To prove this limit we must find a d > 0 such that for all x, 0 < | x - 3 | < d Þ |(3x - 7) - 2 | < e where e > 0. To do this, we will work backwards as before.
|
|
EXAMPLE 7: |
|
|
SOLUTION: To prove this limit we must find a d > 0 such that for all x, 0 < | x - 9 | < d Þ
Why did I pick Abs((2 - e ) 2 - 4) for d ? It is the smaller of the two values in absolute value. |
|
EXAMPLE 8: |
|
|
SOLUTION: To prove this limit we must find a d > 0 such that for all x, 0 < | x - 1 | < d Þ
|
Notice that on all of the examples that I have worked here, I have started with the last expression (the one involving e ) and worked backwards to find d . This is the way that I was taught to do these problems, and I feel that it is a good way to approach them. Work through these examples, making sure that you understand all of the steps that I have done. I will admit that this is a hard topic for students to understand. If you have any questions on any of the examples, please feel free to contact me.
RETURN TO INDEX